"sharp logic" is a perfectly correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used to describe someone's ability to think logically or to describe an argument or line of reasoning that is especially logical or clever. Example: The lawyer's sharp logic won her the case.
With razor-sharp logic, Currie argues that as first women aren't as ambitious as men, and second actually prefer to stay at home and bring up babies, ergo, they shouldn't expect to be paid as much (for doing the same job, mind) as men.
"You can give the most brilliant talk, with crystal-clear explanations and laser-sharp logic, but if you don't first connect with the audience it just won't land".
Every typo leaps off the page and you realise that your caffeine-fuelled, razor-sharp midnight logic makes about as much sense as a Danish art-house film.
This double requirement of orators leads Campbell to make a sharp distinction between logic and grammar, on the grounds that though both have rules, the rules of logic are universal and those of grammar particular.
In his seminal paper "Two Dogmas of Empiricism" (1951), Quine rejected, as what he considered the first dogma, the idea that there is a sharp division between logic and empirical science.
By the same logic, a sharp downturn can shake confidence.
The Stirling prize-winning Astley Castle, by Witherford Watson Mann, followed a similar logic, inserting sharp blank walls of brick into the burnt-out ruins of an old manor house.
But upon a sharp second look, all logic seems to fly out the window.
Best of all, it offers hope for a sharp and principled demarcation of logic that avoids cloudy epistemic and semantic terms like "about", "analytic", and "a priori".[14] A limitation of the permutation invariance criterion (as it has been stated so far) is that it applies only to extensional operators and connectives.
Thus, quantifiers are on a par with the other logical operations, in sharp contrast with the other algebraic approaches to logic.
Their logic is that short, sharp bursts of violence will atomize the opposition, frightening protesters to such a degree that they will give up and go home.
