shares between

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "shares between" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct expression would involve "share" in a different context, such as "shares among" or "shares with." Example: "The profits will be shared among the partners."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

44 human-written examples

Sharers want fair shares between people as well.

Yale University

Two billionaires own 97.13% of the shares between them.

The Guardian - Opinion

The other two own 22,000 shares between them.

The New York Times

They hold 17.5% of the shares between them.

The Guardian - Business

The offences relate to trading in Ocado Group plc shares between February and May 2013".

The Guardian - Business

In all, America's financial sector repurchased $207 billion of shares between 2006 and 2008.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

16 human-written examples

Electrons can be shared between neighbouring atoms.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The damage is shared between generations.

The Guardian

Not a word is shared between them.

The Guardian - Music

Parental care is shared between both adults.

Cornell University

Application materials are not shared between schools.

Columbia University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to the distribution of "shares", use precise language like "shares among" or "shares with" to clearly indicate the recipients and the nature of the distribution. This enhances clarity and avoids grammatical ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "between" when distributing shares to more than two entities. "Between" is typically used for two recipients, whereas "among" is more appropriate for three or more. Using "among" ensures grammatical accuracy and avoids confusion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "shares between" typically functions as a prepositional phrase indicating a distribution or relationship. However, its correctness is disputed as it often violates standard grammatical rules, especially when referring to more than two entities. Ludwig identifies it as potentially incorrect.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Academia

30%

Science

30%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "shares between" appears in various sources, it's often grammatically questionable, as highlighted by Ludwig. Its use is best reserved for contexts explicitly involving only two entities, and even then, clearer alternatives like "divided between" are preferable. For multiple entities, "shares among" or "distributed among" are more accurate. Ludwig's analysis suggests careful attention to context and recipient count to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity in writing. Using more precise language will help prevent misinterpretation and maintain a professional tone.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

shares among

Focuses on distribution to multiple recipients. Slightly more direct.

distributed among

Formal term for spreading something across a group.

divided between

Emphasizes a separation into parts for two recipients only.

shared with each other

Highlights the reciprocal sharing action.

split between

Suggests a more informal division, typically for two.

split evenly amongst

Indicates an equal distribution among several entities.

allocated to

Highlights a formal assignment to different parties.

portioned out to

Implies careful measurement and distribution.

divvied up among

Suggests an informal, equal division.

held jointly by

Emphasizes common ownership rather than division.

FAQs

How can I correctly use the term "shares between" in a sentence?

While "shares between" appears in some contexts, it's often grammatically incorrect. It's better to use phrases like "shares among" when referring to more than two entities, or "divided between" for two entities.

What's a better alternative to using "shares between"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "shares among", "distributed among", or "divided between" to ensure grammatical accuracy and clarity.

Is it ever correct to use "shares between"?

In specific contexts where you are explicitly discussing the relationship or division of shares involving only two parties, "shares between" might be used, but it's generally clearer to use "divided between" or a similar phrasing.

What is the difference between "shares between" and "shares among"?

"Shares between" is typically used for two entities, while "shares among" is used when there are three or more. Using "among" is grammatically correct when distributing or discussing shares involving multiple parties.