"shared methodologies" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It refers to a set of methods or approaches that are commonly used and agreed upon by a group or community. Example: "The team of researchers had different backgrounds, but they were able to collaborate effectively due to their shared methodologies in data analysis."
National and international networks in the United States, Canada, Europe, Latin America and Australia are conducting multi-site observational studies with shared methodologies to generate national influenza VE estimates and pool data for regional estimates.
Recent progress toward the application of tissue engineering methodologies for the regeneration of tubular and solid organs including the kidney is identifying shared methodologies that may underlie the development of foundational platform technologies broadly applicable toward the regeneration of multiple organ systems.
Shared methodologies across studies would enable examination of outcomes where the evidence is conflicting, inconclusive, limited or suggests no effect.
The shared methodology of all Auxiliers was: go to ground, wait for the invaders to pass, then conduct sabotage with minimum risk of contact with the enemy.
Many national and international regulations in force, however, are not able to define a fair and shared methodology for SEA yet.
They began to trace the ways that she, like her existential-phenomenological contemporaries, took up and reconfigured their philosophical heritage to reflect their shared methodology and unique insights.
However, the scientific community has not yet agreed on a shared methodology, allowing robust and simultaneous comparisons over all sustainability dimensions.
While it seems unlikely that there is any one factor that unifies this class of theories, perhaps there is a cluster of factors — a common or overlapping set of theoretical constructs, for example, or a shared methodology.
As we have seen, however, their shared methodology notwithstanding, these theorists disagree on just about everything else: on their philosophical reasons for adopting the approach in the first place, on what the correct theory of practical reasoning is, on why one form or another of practical inference is nonoptional or binding, and on what the upshots are for morality or ethics.
EP, MM, MMu and PH conceptualised the study, and developed the shared methodology and research instruments.
The Paris Center acts as a conduit in this endeavor by bringing the two groups into dialogue in a space where they can share methodologies and critical analyses.
