Sentence examples for shared criteria from inspiring English sources

Rank-order the list: Agree with your customer on shared criteria and then score each of the listed problems accordingly.

Other areas of interest include group boundaries, how members of stigmatized groups respond to racism and discrimination, how culture matters for poverty, peer review, shared criteria of evaluation for qualitative social sciences, disciplinary cultures, and interdisciplinarity.

Shiva Naipaul, after a reading on Humberside, received just one question: "Do you live in a mud hut?" Nonetheless, Taylor has several middle-aged regrets about the decline of literary argument, and "the absence of any real aesthetic divide", which decline into a querulous grumble about the loss of shared criteria.

Currently, there are no shared criteria for t f calculation.

Just as there are shared criteria of 'rude' such that not just anything could be considered rude, she argued, there are shared criteria of moral concepts such that not just anything could be a moral virtue or obligation.

However, RV non-compaction has been rarely described [30], since shared criteria to distinguish between normal RV trabeculations and non-compacted pattern has not yet been codified, thus making findings easily undiagnosed by inexperienced readers.

When the lives of individuals are increasingly affected by foreign and supranational institutions, we need a shared criterion of justice by which all social institutions can be assessed.

How then should these different outcomes in what initially appears as a universally shared criterion be valued?

Transportation and logistics players could negotiate coverage by sharing criteria such as risk, route, weather and vehicle type via a blockchain-based insurance market.

Dworkin does not claim that we never share criteria for the application of a word: he says that there may be such shared, uncontroversial tests for the application of a word like 'book'book

He said that to think that disagreement about grounds is never possible, for the reason that to share a subject matter we must share criteria that define it, is a philosophical prejudice: he called the prejudice "the semantic sting" (see Dworkin 1986).