Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(11)
That has riled conservative advocates, who cite a little-noticed quirk in North Carolina's Constitution that disqualifies officeholders "who shall deny the being of Almighty God".
It said: "If the reply we receive is unsatisfactory and there is subsequently any public reference to this exchange we shall deny it took place".
The letter ends with the warning: "If the reply we receive is unsatisfactory and there is subsequently any public reference to this exchange we shall deny that it took place.
As for the Brown decision itself, Brennan wrote: State support of segregated schools through any arrangement... cannot be squared with the [Fourteenth] Amendment's command that no State shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
That clause commands that no State shall "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Almost a century later, the 14th Amendment finally declared that no state shall "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Similar(47)
She sought to persuade the nine men on the Supreme Court to rule, for the first time, that a clause in the Fourteenth Amendment ("no state shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws") prohibited discrimination on the basis of sex, not just race.
The Commission's open access rule is clear that C Block licensees "shall not deny, limit, or restrict the ability of their customers to use the devices and applications of their choice…." The rule also is explicit that C Block licensees may not "disable features on handsets it provides to customers".
It says: "No State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
The 14th Amendment states this: "No state shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Had the Fourteenth Amendment provided that "No State shall... deny to any heterosexual person... the equal protection of the laws," then the debate in 2013 would be about amendment rather than interpretation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com