Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Eventually, only 29/432 (7%) of infants who were eligible for helmet therapy at age 5 months were excluded on the basis the severity of skull deformation.
We determined the severity of skull deformation in the transversal plane using the oblique diameter difference index and the cranioproportional index of plagiocephalometry (fig 2).
Limitations of this study include the difference of severity of skull deformation at baseline between both arms of the trial, a low participation rate, limited generalisability of study results to specific subgroups of infants, and no assessment of daily wearing time of the helmet.
Similar(56)
34 In the present study we defined a clinically meaningful difference as 4 oblique diameter difference index points or 5 cranioproportional index points, consistent with one level of severity in skull deformation according to plagiocephalometry criteria (fig 2).
37 38 We considered a difference in change score from age 5 to 24 months of 4 oblique diameter difference index points or 5 cranioproportional index points to be relevant between the groups, consistent with one level of severity in skull deformation according to plagiocephalometry criteria (fig 2).
bTrauma severity was suspected if at least one of the following criteria was present: suspicion of skull fracture, pelvic fracture, flail chest, spine injury, limb amputation, severe burns, smoke inhalation, mydriasis.
However, it induced strain concentration within the brain, associated with the severity of TBI, and a stress concentration in the skull, leading to higher incidence of skull fracture.
Age, TBI severity and skull fractures are associated with an increased risk of pituitary disorders.
Sigal et al. [3] found that MR images might cause misdiagnosis of the severity of head and neck ACCs, especially in skull base invasion.
Base of skull fracture 9.
Model predictions of skull fracture loads were typically twice the observed level.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com