Sentence examples for severe sample from inspiring English sources

Unfortunately, due to severe sample size restrictions (i.e., the sample consists of 10 firms), the empirical designs lack the power to provide reliable evidence about any such impact.

Hence, matching the BSWS with the ETS not only reduces the sample size substantially but also causes a potentially severe sample selection bias.

This distance also manifested itself by association of a distinct haplogroup, which evolved from the parental strain, with the less severe sample.

They cause severe sample damage within some fsec, and the questions will be which information can be gathered within this time frame.

An item may exhibit a floor effect with a mild sample of patients, because few patients report the problem, but is a useful item in a severe sample of patients.

We "homogenized" the female data set by restricting the analysis to samples with either a) moderate to high severity (severity > 1) that also had a high blue module eigengene value MEblue > mean MEblue) or b) less severe samples (severity = 1) with MEblue < mean MEblue).

It is therefore important that the current findings be replicated in more severe samples (e.g., clinical and forensic).

Future research is needed to determine whether the RD estimates remain constant in more severe samples and with different types of MS. Previous researchers have highlighted the possibility that the RD may vary as a function of severity [ 13, 21].

The analysis focused on six conditions (moderate and severe samples in the disease progression dataset; and primary visual cortex, hippocampal field CA1, middle temporal gyrus, and posterior cingulate cortex regions in the brain regions dataset), where the AD pathway was found statistically enriched.

(For example, the MTL of 7.7 kbp in a severe degenerate sample would have been predicted to be from an 80-year-old; however, this disc sample came from a donor who was only 49 years old).

This bias can be particularly severe when sample sizes of individuals are small, large numbers of markers are used, and true differences between groups are small (Anderson 2010; Waples 2010), all of which may apply to the current study.