Exact(4)
After 720 days of immersion one set of mortars was anodically polarized and another set cathodically polarized.
Two set of mortars were made with three mineral additions to verify the relationship between compressive strength and maturity at later age.
After a curing time of 28 days, a set of mortars was directly tested in terms of thermal conductivity at different moisture content, comparing the results obtained from the corresponding mortars previously submitted to hydrophobic treatment.
Obtained results evidenced that, for the whole set of mortars studied, there is a clear tendency for the improvement of performance when cork granulates are added, either for cyclic uniaxial or for diagonal compression loadings.
Similar(56)
A similar set of mortar compositions was also prepared using a polycarboxylate-based dispersing admixture.
A set of mortar specimens with different arrangements of coin-shaped insulations are produced to examine the anisotropic insulation effect on the material characteristics.
Open image in new window Fig. 2 Autogenous deformation from setting of mortars with LWA fully saturated and the total volume fraction calculated by Eq. (2).
Two sets of mortars differing in type of lime and metakaolin, with air lime:sand volumetric ratio 1 3 were prepared with the aim to be used for restoration of historic masonries.
Open image in new window Fig. 3 Autogenous deformation from setting of mortars with LWA with the amount of entrained water calculated from chemical shrinkage, 1 mm < GS < 2 mm, and higher volume fraction of LWA than the required by Eq. (2).
Open image in new window Fig. 4 Autogenous deformation from setting of mortars with different amounts of SAP. Figure 2 shows the measured autogenous deformation for CEC and Pumice with the amount of entrained water calculated from chemical shrinkage as fully saturated.
The initial setting time of mortars increases with an increasing amount of cement replacement by CFBC fly ash and GGBFS.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com