Suggestions(3)
Exact(3)
"That's what will happen if this set of closures goes ahead".
A set of closures for two-fluid modelling of adiabatic bubbly flows has been defined as baseline model, which provides a common basis for further improvement and development.
Concerning pure fluid dynamics of dispersed gas-liquid multiphase flow, an ongoing effort has led to a validated set of closures that is applicable under a rather broad range of conditions.
Similar(57)
A set of closure relations was collected at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf that represents the best available knowledge.
New high quality experimental data for the fluid dynamics of a bubble column are used to validate a baseline set of closure relations for bubbly flows.
The present work applies a set of closure relations that was previously used with good success to describe bubbly flows in pipes and bubble columns.
In this way, a complete set of closure models for the scalar flux transport equation is prescribed for use in Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes simulations.
A set of closure relations has been collected at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf that represents the best available knowledge and may serve as a baseline model for further investigations.
Recently, the authors have extended the validation of this set of closure relations to the "pseudo-homogeneous" flow regime, by comparing the numerical predictions to a comprehensive experimental dataset (gas holdup, bubble size distributions and local flow measurements).
In conclusion, this paper extends the validation of a previously proposed set of closure relations (validated for the "pseudo-homogeneous" flow regime in a "large-scale" annular gap bubble column) to the "mono-dispersed homogeneous" flow regime in "small-scale" and large-scale bubble columns.
In this paper, the validation of this set of closure relations has been extended to the pseudo-homogeneous flow regime characterized by a wide spectrum of bubble sizes and typically associated with the large sparger openings used in industrial applications in large-scale bubble columns, thus establishing a first step towards the simulation of industrial-scale reactors.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com