Sentence examples for set choices from inspiring English sources

(Using a 1000 day window produces slightly smaller containment estimates; for 3 out of 1000 parameter set choices, this difference was greater than 0.06; the maximum difference seen was 0.23; the mean absolute difference was 0.0029; in only one case out of 1000 did we see containment in all 100 cases for the 250-day window, but not in all 100 cases for the 1000-day window).

As she sang her less-than-obvious set choices — a version of the bebop song "Bernie's Tune," with words by Lieber and Stoller; "Monk's Mood," by Monk, with words by the Dutch singer Soesja Citroen; and Bessie Smith's "Take It Right Back" — she stamped out the lines with authority and power and a bit of outrageousness, as if they were home truths, not history assignments.

With The Sentence, I got more interesting results, but the phrase building is fairly nonsensical, and is based on set choices for each category, whereas you'd expect that in altering one term the other choices might adapt or change accordingly.

While Figure 6 illustrates the possibility that rapid contact tracing may be of decisive importance in some scenarios (parameter set choices), this is not always the case.

For nearly all scenarios (parameter set choices), the containment fraction was smaller (sometimes much smaller) when the contact finding time is faster (since faster contact finding, all else being equal, improves smallpox control, as illustrated in Figure 6).

Finally, we used the "calibrated" scenarios (parameter set choices) to explore the levels of contact finding probability needed to contain the epidemic (as before, defined to mean 500 or fewer cases ultimately resulting from ten initial cases) (Table 4).

One of the most important problems in Mulliken charge analysis is the intense sensitivity of Mulliken charges to the basis set choice.

Whether you have one set choice, or five prospective college choices, it always helps to have a contact with a college or university.

Most of these "categorical" exclusions are unjustifiable from the perspective of protecting normal functioning, but specific limit-setting choices can only be made through a fair, deliberative process.

These constant attributes differ from choice set to choice set.

That means we can also drop the clumsy set choice of the church that dominates the action rather confusingly.