set a vote for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "set a vote for" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts where someone is indicating to schedule or initiate a voting process, but it is not commonly used. Example: "We need to set a vote for the new policy changes during the next meeting."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

The House has not set a vote for the bill.

The New York Times

This first tranche should pass quickly; the House has set a vote for Wednesday.

The New York Times

President Chandrika Kumaratunga dissolved Parliament on Sunday and set a vote for April 2 -- three years early and the third general election in four years.

The New York Times

While the debt limit action will occur mainly behind the scenes, the Senate has set a vote for Tuesday to bring a bipartisan resolution to the floor authorizing United States participation in military operations in Libya.

The New York Times

Freshman lawmakers say it was their insistence that has also led House Republican leaders to set a vote for next week on a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution.

The New York Times

A1 In Washington, House Republican leaders set a vote for next week on a resolution of "solidarity" with Israel, rejecting a plea by Secretary of State Colin L. Powell to hold off.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

The Senate set a test vote for 1 am on Sunday, a middle-of-the-night roll vote that underscored the limited time available to lawmakers.

Independent

John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has set a committee vote for Wednesday.

The New York Times

An election commission loyal to Mr. Thaksin set a new vote for Oct. 15, but its members were removed and jailed by a court for malfeasance.

The New York Times

First Minister David Trimble, leader of the Ulster Unionists, has set a party vote for Feb. 12 on whether to remain in government with Sinn Fein.

The New York Times

Equity Office, which was advised by Merrill Lynch and the law firm of Sidley Austin, said it would still back Blackstone and set a shareholder vote for yesterday.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider using more common alternatives like "schedule a vote for" or "arrange a vote for" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "set a vote for" in formal writing. While it may be understood, its non-standard nature can detract from the clarity and professionalism of your communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "set a vote for" functions as a verb phrase aiming to describe the act of scheduling or arranging a voting process. However, according to Ludwig AI, its grammatical correctness is disputable. Examples in Ludwig show its use in news articles, but more standard alternatives exist.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "set a vote for" is understandable, it's not the most grammatically sound choice. Ludwig AI indicates that its correctness is disputable and advises using more conventional options. Its communicative purpose is to announce the scheduling of a vote, primarily in neutral contexts such as news reports. For clearer and more authoritative communication, consider alternatives like "schedule a vote for" or "arrange a vote for".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

schedule a vote for

Replaces "set" with "schedule", making the phrase more conventional and grammatically sound.

arrange a vote for

Substitutes "set" with "arrange", providing a similar meaning with improved grammatical clarity.

call a vote for

Uses "call" instead of "set", indicating the initiation of a voting process.

fix a vote for

Employs "fix" to mean establishing or setting up a vote, which is a less common but potentially valid substitution.

establish a vote for

Replaces "set" with "establish", emphasizing the creation or formalization of the vote.

organize a vote for

Substitutes "set" with "organize", focusing on the preparatory actions for the vote.

plan a vote for

Uses "plan" instead of "set", highlighting the planning stage of arranging the vote.

determine a vote for

Replaces "set" with "determine", suggesting the act of deciding on a vote.

put a vote on the calendar for

More explicitly describes placing the vote on a schedule.

table a vote for

Implies formally proposing a vote to be considered.

FAQs

What is a better way to say "set a vote for"?

Alternatives include "schedule a vote for", "arrange a vote for", or "call a vote for". These options are more grammatically standard and widely accepted.

Is "set a vote for" grammatically correct?

While understandable, "set a vote for" is not considered grammatically standard English. It's better to use alternatives like "schedule a vote for" to ensure clarity and correctness.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "set a vote for"?

It's generally safer to avoid this phrase in formal contexts. If you choose to use it, ensure your audience understands your intended meaning, which is to schedule or arrange a vote. Using "call a vote for" in formal context will deliver a clear and precise meaning.

How does "set a vote for" differ from "schedule a vote for"?

"Schedule a vote for" is more conventional and grammatically sound. "Set a vote for" can sound awkward or non-idiomatic to some English speakers. So, it is important to use "schedule a vote for" rather than the opposite.