Sentence examples for session interactions from inspiring English sources

This was revealed in the Condition × Session interactions, where the effects of practice were more pronounced in the on-task IVIS condition than in the single-task condition.

In the two sleep groups, subjects felt more sleepy and less activated, motivated and concentrated in task sessions performed in the middle of the night (i.e., initial practice for Late-NG, retest for Early-NG) than in sessions performed in the evening (initial practice for Early-NG) or in the morning (retest for Late-NG) (p<0.05, for Sleep Group x Session interactions).

However, no significant session effects and group × session interactions were observed.

The 48 resulting covariance maps for each seed ROI (2 groups of 12 subjects, two sessions) were then tested for significant group × session interactions.

This feature has an additional benefit of allowing groups of users in a consortium to keep a record of session interactions, and consequently, fulfill the ideals of a fully reproducible research paradigm.

Thus the main group × session interactions are within the components identified by the PICA analysis; however, there are small but significant regions lying outside of the fronto-parietal and cerebellar components that are affected by motor learning.

Rats with LMN lesions took significantly longer to locate the hidden platform, F 1, 10) = 15.7, p <.0005, and this effect did not interact with training session, Group × Session interaction, F 9, 90) = 1.41, p =.20.

The effects of both URB597 (Figure 3c; MK886 dose × session interaction, F10, 20=2.56, p=0.035) and URB694 (Figure 3d; MK886 dose × session interaction, F5, 15=3.99, p=0.017) on nicotine self-administration were reduced by MK886 pretreatment.

(b,c) Runners learned faster than sedentary mice in the high interference (Group main effect: F1,72=94.79, P<0.0001; Group × Session interaction: F6,72=3.40, P<0.01) but not low-interference (Group main effect: F1,72=0.00, P>0.05) condition.

The Condition × Session interaction (Figs. 3 and 4) indicates that the effects of practice were more pronounced when participants were using the IVIS than when they were in the single-task condition.

The breakpoints varied among the sessions (session effect: F 4, 56) = 3.1, p<0.02), independently of group (group x session interaction: n.s).s