Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(37)
(Figure 3C) and response levels were stable across sessions (session effect: n.s).s
The OKR phase lag decreased with the number of training sessions in both genotypes (session effect, F 9,207) = 25.8, p<0.001; Fig. 6F).
The breakpoints varied among the sessions (session effect: F 4, 56) = 3.1, p<0.02), independently of group (group x session interaction: n.s).s
Saccharin self-administration increased across sessions (session effect: F 9, 126) = 14.2, p<0.0001), independently of group (group x session: n.s).s
Although saccharin-exposed and control rats showed similar levels of saccharin intake during the FR1 (group effect: n.s.; session effect: F(14, 196) = 16.5, p<0.0001; group x session interaction: n.s)., saccharin-exposed rats earned less saccharin reinforcements than control rats (group effect: F 1, 14) = 6.6, p<0.05; session effect: F 6, 84) = 14.2, p<0.00001; group x session interaction: n.s).s
Males exhibited a higher mean rate of superoxide accumulation compared to females (1.47±0.18 vs. 0.50±0.18 slope value, Fig. 3) and this was independent of any session effect (estimated covariance parameter: 0.08±0.13).
Similar(23)
The latter has been found to be very successful for modelling the inter-speaker variability and hence for compensating for channel or session effects in the high-dimensional GMM supervector space.
To determine session effects (i.e., post-training versus pre-training), we first statistically compared the post-training data with the pre-training data using a fixed-effects linear model in each subject.
This indicates, after controlling for other factors, that males in Mug voluntarily contribute significantly more than males or females in all other treatments and our results are robust to controlling for session effects.
However, no significant session effects and group × session interactions were observed.
Realignment parameters and main session effects were defined as the first level covariates.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com