serious mismatch

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "serious mismatch" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a significant discrepancy or incompatibility between two or more elements, such as ideas, expectations, or data. Example: "There was a serious mismatch between the project's goals and the resources allocated, leading to delays."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

33 human-written examples

This suggested a serious mismatch between the stock of foreign liabilities and assets.

Columbia University

There was a serious mismatch between military and civilian resources on the ground.

The Guardian

"Serious mismatch," a patron recently remarked as she peered over at one such pairing.

The New Yorker

It is a best-of-seven series, but it looked like a serious mismatch after the opener.

The New York Times

Another is doing something about the serious mismatch between numbers of law students and trainee lawyer jobs.

The Guardian

The ZrN/Zr bilayered structure buffers the serious mismatch between the substrate and ZrN coating thus improving film adhesion.

Surface and Coatings Technology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

27 human-written examples

Serious mismatches should be found if T cells were hindered by mechanistic constraints or vestiges of their (co- evolutionary history, but I have not found co- evolutionary

Journal of Theoretical Biology

As Lee (2013) underscored, WCF is an area of L2 research where serious mismatches exist between researchers' research findings and teachers' classroom applications.

Language Testing in Asia

(3) We observed serious mismatching of MHC class II loci between the H1 and H2 haplotypes.

Plosone

Furthermore, the presence of serious mismatching of MHC class II loci between these two haplotypes suggested that some powerful ancestral MHC class II haplotypes containing more loci may have once existed in the Père David's deer.

Plosone

The results indicate that serious spatial mismatch exists between grain production and farmland resources in China.

Land Use Policy

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "serious mismatch", ensure that the context clearly identifies the elements being compared and why their incompatibility is significant. This will strengthen the impact of your statement and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "serious mismatch" for minor discrepancies. Reserve it for situations where the incompatibility has significant consequences or implications. Using it too liberally can dilute its impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "serious mismatch" primarily functions as a noun phrase that describes a significant lack of alignment or compatibility between two or more entities. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is grammatically correct and suitable for use in various writing contexts. Examples from Ludwig demonstrate its use in diverse situations, from financial liabilities to resource allocation.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

42%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Academia

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "serious mismatch" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed phrase used to denote a substantial lack of alignment between two or more elements. As confirmed by Ludwig, this phrase is well-suited for formal, neutral, and professional communication settings, including news reports, scientific papers, and business correspondence. While "serious mismatch" frequently appears in News & Media and Science, it is recommended to reserve this phrase for scenarios involving substantial consequences or implications to avoid diluting its impact. Semantically related alternatives include "significant discrepancy" and "major incompatibility". In conclusion, comprehending the proper usage and implications of "serious mismatch" enhances clarity and precision in written and spoken communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significant discrepancy

Emphasizes the difference in quantity or degree between two things.

major incompatibility

Highlights the inability of two or more things to exist or work together.

substantial divergence

Suggests a significant point where two things differ.

grave inconsistency

Focuses on the lack of logical or factual agreement.

pronounced disparity

Indicates a noticeable difference, often in terms of inequality.

severe imbalance

Highlights a lack of proportion or equilibrium.

critical misalignment

Emphasizes the faulty positioning or direction.

notable incongruity

Suggests something out of place or unsuitable.

considerable gap

Highlights the extent of difference between to things.

marked contrast

Focuses on how things are strikingly different.

FAQs

How can I use "serious mismatch" in a sentence?

You can use "serious mismatch" to describe a significant incompatibility between two or more things. For example, "There was a serious mismatch between the company's goals and its resources."

What are some alternatives to "serious mismatch"?

Alternatives include "significant discrepancy", "major incompatibility", or "substantial divergence", depending on the specific context.

Is it appropriate to use "serious mismatch" in formal writing?

Yes, "serious mismatch" is appropriate for formal writing, particularly in business, academic, or news contexts where precise language is valued. The level of formality depends on the register of the publication, but the phrase itself is acceptable.

What does "serious mismatch" imply beyond a simple difference?

A "serious mismatch" implies that the incompatibility is not only present but also has significant negative consequences or implications. It suggests a problem that needs to be addressed.