serious lack of

USAGE SUMMARY

'serious lack of' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to refer to a severe shortfall, deficit, or dearth of something. For example, you could say: "Due to a serious lack of resources, the project was unable to proceed."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That' a serious lack of plan.

MIT Technology Review

She added that there was a "serious lack of evidence".

The Guardian

"It shows a serious lack of transparency," Mr Rappaport added.

The Guardian

The proposed campus plan indicates a serious lack of concern for handicapped access.

Princeton University

"Meaningless names, meaningless messages and a serious lack of stature were the major leave-behinds".

The New York Times

There is a serious lack of investment in critical infrastructure like schools and hospitals.

The Guardian

It's atrocious and appalling - they're experienced coaches, but there's a serious lack of investment.

The Guardian - Sport

Moreover, there is a serious lack of experimental results and benchmark problems.

Mathematical and Computer Modelling

The committee said ASI's actions were "deplorable", "entirely inappropriate" and showed a "serious lack of judgment".

The Guardian

There is a serious lack of financial scholarships available to help.

The Guardian

Cosmic Egg is the sound of a serious lack of invention.

The Guardian - Music

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To enhance clarity, follow "serious lack of" with a concrete noun rather than an abstract concept.

Common error

Avoid using "serious lack of" when the deficiency is already apparent or implied. Instead, focus on the impact or implications of the lack.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "serious lack of" functions as a noun phrase, typically acting as the subject or object of a sentence or clause. It denotes a significant deficiency or absence of something, as supported by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Academia

25%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "serious lack of" is a frequently used and grammatically sound noun phrase that signifies a notable deficiency. According to Ludwig, it's suitable for various contexts, predominantly in News & Media, Academic and Scientific domains. When employing this phrase, ensure you articulate what is lacking to provide clarity and impact. Alternatives such as "significant deficiency of" or "critical shortage of" can be used to diversify your writing. Avoid using it when the deficiency is already evident. Remember, Ludwig AI confirms its acceptability in English writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significant deficiency of

Emphasizes the inadequacy or insufficiency of something.

substantial absence of

Highlights the non-existence or unavailability of something.

critical shortage of

Focuses on the scarcity and urgency of needing something.

marked dearth of

Indicates a noticeable and considerable lack of something.

acute insufficiency of

Stresses the severity and inadequacy of something.

grave deficit of

Emphasizes the serious and concerning nature of the deficiency.

pronounced inadequacy of

Highlights the clear and obvious insufficiency of something.

considerable scarcity of

Focuses on the limited availability of something.

notable absence of

Indicates something is conspicuously missing.

major shortfall in

Highlights a significant gap or deficit in something.

FAQs

How to use "serious lack of" in a sentence?

You can use "serious lack of" to describe a significant deficiency or absence. For instance, "There is a "serious lack of" funding for the project" or "The investigation revealed a "serious lack of" oversight".

What can I say instead of "serious lack of"?

Alternatives include "significant deficiency of", "substantial absence of", or "critical shortage of" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "serious lack of" or "severely lacking in"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "serious lack of" is a noun phrase, while "severely lacking in" is a verb phrase. The choice depends on the sentence structure you prefer. For instance, "There is a "serious lack of" preparation" versus "The team is severely lacking in preparation".

What's the difference between "serious lack of" and "minor lack of"?

"Serious lack of" indicates a significant and concerning deficiency, while "minor lack of" suggests a small or insignificant deficiency. The choice depends on the severity of the issue you're describing.