Exact(1)
Dynamic FLASH 3-D (three-dimensional fast low-angle shot) contrast-enhanced series were performed using the following parameters: radiofrequency spoiled gradient-echo; no fat suppression; 5 measurements (series); 80 sections; each section 2 mm at 2-mm intervals; matrix 384 × 512; 340-mm field of view; 10/4.5; flip angle 25°; parallel imaging factor of 2, and 1 acquisition (measurement).
Similar(59)
A pelletizing series was performed using a full factorial design having independent factors such as die temperature (35 65 °C), raw material moisture content (12 15% w.b ., and raw material temperature/steam conditioning (0 2 kg/h), with continuous or discontinuous feed layer formation as responses.
Comparison within one time series was performed using a global Friedman test followed by a Wilcoxon test to compare selected time points.
Meta-analysis of pooled results from previous published series was performed using the χ test.
Firstly, a retrospective (non-comparative) case series was performed using data extracted from the Hospital Episode Statistics HESS) database.
Alignment of the tilt series was performed using the etomo tomography processing software from the Imod package.
GEP testing on all cases in this series was performed using a previously described PCR-based 15-gene assay comprising 12 discriminating genes and three endogenous control genes [ 10].
Then, a DCE perfusion imaging dynamic series was performed using a T1-twist sequence with a flip angle of 12° (TR/TE = 4.82/1.88 ms, FOV = 260 mm × 260 mm, matrix = 138 × 192, slice thickness = 3.6 mm), which was comprised of 70 measurements with a temporal spacing of approximately 8 s.
Blinded time series experiments were performed using images recorded continuously from a single focal plane.
Focal series reconstructions were performed using the Gerchberg Saxton algorithm [10] where the implementation for HRTEM is described fully in [11, 12].
A series of experiments were performed using the central composite design method.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com