Suggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Sequences with total unmasked lengths of 30 bp or more were used.
TE interspersed repeat family signatures were identified using Mips-REdat_v9.0p database hosted by the MIPS at PlantsDB [ 57], that contains ~42.000 sequences with total length of ~350 Mb.
†The percentage of control sequences with total scores below the cutoff score *Number of predicted candidates with total scores above the Cutoff score set from control analysis The new G. intestinalis snoRNAs all have different target pseudouridylation sites on rRNAs, whereas two of the T. vaginalis new snoRNAs (Tv/ACA.3 and Tv/ACA.10) share the same target (LSU rRNA U2214).
Similar(57)
In this study 4 individual domestic cats (Felis catus) were subjected to antibody repertoire sequencing with total number of sequences generated 1079863 for VH for IgG, 1050824 VH for IgM, 569518 for VK and 450195 for VL.
Moreover, the total length of dinucleotide sequences was much larger than the other repetitive sequences, with a total length of 288.42 Kb.
The sequence analysis involved an alignment of 37 ITS sequences with a total of 641 positions (Appendix S1) and an alignment of 23 chloroplast sequences with a total of 2413 positions (Appendix S2).
We first aligned all the sRNA sequencing reads to miRBase without mismatch, identifying seven miR399-like sRNA sequences with a total of 644 reads in P-deficient barley and five miR399-like sequences with a total of 62 reads in P-sufficient barley (Additional file 1: Table S1).
The resulting Hi-C scaffolds comprised 1161 sequences, with a total length of 989.8 Mb and a scaffold N50 of 48.5 Mb (Supplementary Figure 1e).
The hybrid scaffolds comprised 1438 sequences with a total length of 1019.8 Mb and a scaffold N50 of 13.9 Mb (Supplementary Figure 1d).
Six of the 10 most abundant EBV miRNAs shared their seed sequences with a total of 11 human miRNAs.
The Nasonia genome assembly 1.0 consists of 6,181 scaffold sequences with a total of 295.1 Mb [26].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com