Sentence examples for sequences were assessed with from inspiring English sources

Similarity percentages between sequences and reference sequences were assessed with the SimPlot program version 3.5.1.

To verify the reliability of our results, all putative non-redundant sequences were assessed with UniProt (http://www.uniprot.org/) and SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) analysis, respectively.

To verify the reliability of our results, all putative non-redundant sequences were assessed with UniProt and SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) analyses, respectively.

To verify the reliability of our results, all putative non-redundant sequences were assessed with PROSITE profiling and SMART analysis, respectively.

Similarity between various sequences was assessed with ClustalW [29].

The candidate sequences are assessed with a quality function [26] taking codon usage, GC-content, mRNA structure and species-specific sequence motifs into account.

The usefulness of 454-derived sequences was assessed with the specific goal of identifying new genes and improving gene predictions.

The identification of repeat sequences was assessed with the following parameters: options at a minimum length of 50 bp and 90% or greater sequence identity.

Potential recombination among aligned sequences was assessed with a quartet-based recombination detection program VisRD3 [ 82], both at nucleotide and protein levels.

Elimination of contaminating sequences was assessed with MEGAN5 and contigs assigned to Viridiplantae were retained for further analyses, as well as those that did not have any hits against the NCBI nucleotide database, because we can not exclude that these originate from sugarcane.

Genotyping accuracy by sequencing was assessed with repeat sequencing of a subset of genotypes.