Sentence examples for sequences of objects from inspiring English sources

Tarski defined truth for formal (logical or mathematical) languages in terms of a relation of "satisfaction" between the constituents of a sentence and sequences of objects.

It turns out that relational predicates require talk of satisfaction by ordered sequences of objects.

The poses and sequences of objects in the work are pre-defined.

And one way to develop this idea is to think of the property of being an omega-sequence as a very complex relational property that could be instantiated by actual sequences of objects of the appropriate sort.

Tarski, who did not make Bolzano's assumption with respect to languages, stated his definitive formulation in terms of models, or the satisfaction of sentential functions by sequences of objects.

But we do not suppose that objects that enter into a natural relation form a natural kind, nor that there is a natural kind of ordered sequences of objects satisfying a given natural relation.

Results demonstrated the deposited sequences of object are part of intron 1, exon 2 is fully sequenced with Zaraibi and Baladi breeds; the intron 1, exon 1 with Baladi breed; and the intron 2, part of exon 3 with Damascus breed.

Columnist Oliver Burkeman recommends "shuffling your thoughts" – a technique that involves mentally picturing a random sequence of objects for a few seconds.

The cognitive shuffle involves mentally picturing a random sequence of objects for a few seconds each: a cow; a microphone; a loaf of bread, and so on.

The resulting solution is not a solution to KPZ; rather, it can be used as the starting point to construct a sequence of objects that, in the limit, converges to a solution of KPZ.

Tate Modern has managed to borrow Small Sphere and Heavy Sphere (1932), where human intervention sets a little white ball swinging among a sequence of objects – box, bottle, gong – arranged in a ring.