A comparison between these correlations computed separately for each participant shows that the correlations between preference and harmony are reliably higher than those between preference and similarity [ t(47) = 8.24, p <.001].
Pairwise FST values, calculated separately for each marker, showed no obvious consistent patterns, apart from the suggestion at three loci (HLA-B, rs7853989 and NRY) that the Orcadian samples appear to be significantly different from the rest (Supplementary Table 4).
Therefore, I suggest presenting the results in Figure 1 and Figure 3 separately for each patient, showing on the same graph the BGA, ScvO 2 and NIRS measurements, and allow for visual assessment of the relationship in each patient at each time point.
Analyses performed separately for each complication showed that NT-proBNP values in the highest quartile were independently associated with a 3.95-fold increased OR of CVD, a 4.38-fold increased OR of nephropathy, and a 4.32-fold increased OR of DSP, which were statistically significant.
Running the analyses separately for each cohort however, shows relatively stable estimators across cohorts.
Then we conducted a multivariate ANOVA to compare the mean number of teleological explanations (both for color and shape) separately for each item type shown to children between the three groups a three (grade: K, first grade, second grade) by three (object type: organisms vs. artifacts vs. non-living natural objects) ANOVA.
To compare the readmission experience of cases and controls, Kaplan-Meier (K-M) Survivor Curves were plotted separately for each group (not shown).
To analyze the localizer data we used a fixed-effects analysis to identify, separately for each participant, regions showing significantly (P <.001, uncorrected) greater activity during house blocks than during face blocks (PPA), and regions showing the opposite pattern (FFA).
Questions showing DIF were calibrated separately for each of the groups showing DIF and after DIF correction final GRMs were calculated.
Follow-up ANOVAs with factors Chord, Hemisphere, Anterior-Posterior, and Expertise, calculated separately for each set of stimuli, showed that stimuli of both sets elicited a significant N5 (main effect of Chord for Set A: F 1,22) = 19.58, p<.001; and Set B: F 1,22) = 5.88, p<.025).
