sentences with

USAGE SUMMARY

"sentences with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to introduce a clause that describes the features of the sentence or sentences that will follow. For example: "Sentences with direct objects are easy to identify."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Do not pepper sentences with them unnecessarily".

The Guardian

He sprinkles sentences with "youse guys".

The New York Times - Sports

Brady tossed off printable, forgettable sentences with professional ease.

The New Yorker

That principle applies to sentences with the same effect.

The New York Times

Sentences with relative clauses are always a challenge to parse.

The New York Times

Ministers have suggested replacing short sentences with community punishments.

The Economist

Avoid the dizzying effect of beginning successive sentences with "but".

The New York Times

So you start your sentences with "I feel".

The New York Times

(Americans start sentences with "Oh, gee," or "Say, Fred").

The New Yorker

She talks in slow, careful sentences with lots of pauses.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

He punctuates his sentences with short, nervous laughs.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "sentences with", ensure that the characteristic you are describing is clearly and directly related to the sentence structure or content. For example, "sentences with complex clauses" is more precise than "sentences with many words".

Common error

Avoid using "sentences with" in overly broad contexts. Instead of saying "sentences with good grammar", focus on a specific grammatical aspect like "sentences with correct subject-verb agreement".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "sentences with" functions as a modifier, introducing a category or classification of sentences based on shared attributes. It prefaces a description of the sentences that possess a particular characteristic, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

36%

News & Media

58%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Wiki

1%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "sentences with" serves as a versatile tool for categorizing sentences based on their attributes. It is grammatically correct and widely employed, as confirmed by Ludwig. To use this phrase effectively, clarity and specificity are essential. Ludwig's examples illustrate that the phrase sees frequent use in science and news media contexts, while related alternatives provide nuanced ways to express similar ideas. When using "sentences with", aim for precision in describing the characteristic you are classifying.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

expressions with

Focuses on the specific words or phrases used within sentences rather than the sentences themselves.

phrases with

Emphasizes shorter, distinct parts of language inside sentences.

statements with

Highlights sentences that assert something, shifting focus to declarative content.

clauses with

Refers to sentence components containing a subject and verb.

lines with

Implies written or spoken text arranged sequentially.

passages with

Denotes extended segments from a longer text.

segments with

Breaks text into portions based on meaning or structure.

sections with

Indicates well-defined parts of writing.

articles with

Denotes a complete piece of writing on a specific topic.

documents with

Refers to formal written records.

FAQs

How can I use "sentences with" in my writing?

Use "sentences with" to introduce a specific type of sentence based on its characteristics. For instance, "sentences with active verbs" or "sentences with subordinate clauses" highlight particular structural or grammatical elements.

What are some alternatives to using "sentences with"?

Depending on the context, you might use phrases like "sentences that include", "sentences featuring", or simply describe the sentence type directly. For instance, instead of "sentences with adjectives", you could say "adjective-rich sentences".

Is it better to use "sentences with" or a more specific description?

Specificity is key. While "sentences with" is grammatically correct, a more precise description often improves clarity. For example, instead of "sentences with figurative language", try "sentences employing metaphors and similes".

How does the structure of sentences affect their interpretation when using "sentences with"?

The structure directly impacts how "sentences with" is understood. For example, "sentences with complex syntax" are interpreted differently than simple, declarative sentences. To enhance clarity, specify the syntactic elements.