But right from the second sentence, something smells as moldy as some of those eighteenth and nineteenth century figures themselves: Of the three tendencies, Brooks writes, the first, orthodox liberalism, is "a belief in using government to maximize equality".
It can have the same truth conditions as a scoped sentence something like, 'It might have been the case that: for some x, x is the famous humanist most closely associated with the Italian Renaissance and x has never been famous', which is false.
There's no occasion to ask something as basic as "Where do sentences come from?" Certain kinds of writers do try to answer this question.
They analyzed a sentence like "some apples are delicious" in terms of the sentence "something is an apple and delicious", whereas they parsed the sentence "every material object is extended" as "everything is extended, if it is a material object".
To explain how sentences such as 'I accept what Mary just denied' may be true, Moltmann allows the relation component R in some attitudinal objects to shrink to something as thin as "entertaining".
First sentence: "Something was pressing the life out of him".
This could manifest itself in something as simple as forgetting your keys or forgetting what you were about to say in the middle of a sentence.
As a read and reread those two sentences, something in me released.
Short little sentences, something ungrammatical: McNulty or Salinger.
"I think when we frame femininity in a sentence as something that's sacrificed if we succeed instead of something that's celebrated, that's the first problem," she told HuffPost.
Getting a just sentence should not depend on something as arbitrary as the date the crime was committed, especially when sentences for that crime have been unjust all along.
