Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
The first sentence of Conclusions.
2. In reference to first sentence of "Conclusions" section of Abstract: This sentence is a speed bump for me.
Similar(57)
[Environ Health Perspect 120 1391 1396 (2012)], the last sentence of the "Conclusions" was incorrect: The nighttime traffic noise level associated with insomnia symptoms in the total study population should have been "> 55 dB" instead of "> 50 dB".
Secondly, in the first sentence of the Conclusions section of the Abstract, the statement "One in four suicide victims fulfilled the criteria for a psychiatric diagnosis", should read "One in five suicide victims fulfilled the criteria for a psychiatric diagnosis".
Perhaps the word "hypothesize" would be better suited than "propose" in the second to last sentence of the Conclusion.
3. The final sentence of the conclusion of the abstract is rather odd.
As such, the first sentence of the conclusion is correct as a summary of their results on high coverage; nevertheless, their own results and the results from the literature do not sufficiently justify the second part of their conclusions.
The final sentence of the conclusion sums up how we interpret our findings of the study: "Whereas elevated levels of VWF and decreased fibrinolytic capacity may be related to thrombotic complications in liver transplant recipients, this risk may be attenuated in part by decreased thrombin generating capacity".
Try re-wording your thesis statement in a way that complements your summary of the topic of your paper in your first sentence of your conclusion.
Therefore, the last sentences of the Conclusion section are strongly over-stated.
Then an argument from set S of sentences to conclusion A is valid iff any interpretation that actually verifies S actually verifies A. (Here, a set S of sentences is actually verified just if all of its members are actually verified).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com