Sentence examples for sentence formulation from inspiring English sources

A second group of theories attribute verb inflection errors to disruptions that arise during sentence formulation, either for syntactic reasons or due to impairments in making fine semantic distinctions between inflectional variants of a verb (+PAST → ate, hugged; +FUTURE → will eat, will hug).

Jeffery Ketland (2004) argues in detail that the Newman objection trivialises the Ramsey sentence formulation of ESR.

Melia and Saatsi (2006) also argue that intensional notions, such as naturalness and causal significance, may be applied to properties to save the Ramsey sentence formulation of ESR from triviality.

Only participants with dysarthria showed impairments in language, affecting sentence formulation and semantic association.

In the whole TBI group, sentence formulation was best predicted by combined corpus callosum and left arcuate volumes, suggesting this "dual blow" seriously reduces the potential for functional reorganisation.

As shown in the previous section, the token-based formulation method obviously outperformed the dictionary-based approach and the sentence-by-sentence formulation.

Compared with the traditional sentence classification formulation, the proposed token-based formulation proposed an integrated solution without the requirement to develop additional heuristics rules for isolating the heading from the surrounding section contents.

This analysis exposed the potential problem of the sentence-by-sentence classification formulation.

A friend once told him, "In great writing, the proportion between the total number of sentences and those sentences whose formulation was especially striking or pregnant was about one to thirty whereas it was more like one to two in [your] case".

A friend once told him, "In great writing, the proportion between the total number of sentences and those sentences whose formulation was especially striking or pregnant was about one to thirty — whereas it was more like one to two in [your] case".

An alternate interpretation, advanced in different ways by Tuckness, draws attention to the fact that in the following sentences the formulation of natural law that Locke focuses on is a positive one, that "as much as possible" mankind is to be preserved.