Formal writing generally uses longer sentences: compound, complex, and compound-complex sentences.
Perhaps it is because William remains true to Aristotelian logic, and does not recognize 'hypotheticals', i.e. sentences compounded of other sentences using sentential connectives, as well-formed statements.
AGM correctly identifies the simple subject "I" and notes that the sentence is compound, with two simple predicates (or verbs), "lived" and "earned".
In a compound sentence: A compound sentence has two or more parts that could each be a single sentence, joined by a conjunction.
Moreover, whereas negated sentences can be embedded into compound sentences, speech acts cannot be constituents of other speech acts.
In experiment 1, GR made errors on the verb constituent more frequently than on the noun, an effect that did not emerge in Experiment 2: when embedded in sentences, VN compounds were read significantly better than verb-phrases and no grammatical-class effect emerged.
Open cloze questions are difficult to answer than the other objective type questions like MCQs or CQs; moreover, question generated from complex or compound sentence has a more complicated answer rather than the simple sentence.
They are similar to classical logic because they accept the principle of truth-functionality, namely, that the truth of a compound sentence is determined by the truth values of its component sentences (and so remains unaffected when one of its component sentences is replaced by another sentence with the same truth value).
In the case of propositional logic, a standard view is that the meaning of logical connectives such as conjunction is given by a truth table, which shows how the truth or falsity of a compound sentence is determined by the truth values of its component sentences.
