Sentence examples for sentence complexity from inspiring English sources
The phrase "sentence complexity" is correct and usable in written English
You can use it to refer to the complexity of a sentence's structure or the difference in difficulty when writing sentences of different complexity. For example, "This sentence has a high level of sentence complexity, making it difficult to understand."
Because written texts are almost entirely divorced from oral pronunciation, sentence length and sentence complexity can be carried to extremes, as may be observed in some legal and legislative documents that are virtually unintelligible if read aloud.
This paper reports the results of five experiments designed to investigate the effects of referential processing on sentence complexity.
Experiments 1, 2 and 3 used questionnaires to gauge sentence complexity, whereas Experiments 4 and 5 used self-paced reading.
Each experiment manipulated noun phrases (NPs) in the subject positions of object-extracted relative clauses in order to determine how different types of NPs affected sentence complexity.
The anomaly-sensitive sites correspond approximately to those that previous studies (Michael et al., 2001; Constable et al., 2004) have found to be sensitive to other differences in sentence complexity (object relative minus subject relative).
First, the test items were developed by using a restricted set of vocabulary and grammar structures (see the "Methods" section), which limited the sentence complexity and vocabulary width of the test prompts (i.e., dialogs).
For each analysis, 6 readability scales were used--Flesch-Kincaid, Automated Readability Index, Linsear Write, New Fog Count, Simplified Automated Readability Index, and Flesch Reading Ease--to determine the readability of the text by analyzing syllable count, length of sentences, complexity of words, and other text characteristics.
These programs calculate a score or grade level foryour writing based on numerous characteristics, including sentence length, complexity of word choice, and so on.
With respect to the number of words per sentence (syntactic complexity), the results show that the mean at Time 1 was 12.73 words, that the means increased over time by 2.08 words, and that there were no differences in the initial mean (nonsignificant −0.29).
These recursive clauses (called "truth conditions") can be reapplied until the truth of a non-elementary, molecular sentence of arbitrary complexity is reduced to the truth or falsehood of its elementary, atomic constituents.
Let 'φ(x)' be an open sentence of any complexity with the free variable x (the variable x may have more than one occurrence in φ(x), but for simplicity, assume it has only one occurrence).
