Sentence examples for sensitivity to item from inspiring English sources

We found that experts and novices perceived different item features to be of significance in card sort tasks, and that sensitivity to item surface features was adversely associated with problem solving success.

Thus, similar to the findings from research in physics education, we found that our participants' sensitivity to item surface features in problem categorization was adversely associated with problem solving success (see also Chi et al. 1981; Sabella and Redish 2007; Reif 2008; Nehm and Ha 2011).

Relative to the control and depressed groups the PTSD group exhibited greater sensitivity to correctly recognised stimuli in the left amygdala/ventral striatum and right occipital cortex, and more specific sensitivity to items encoded in emotional contexts in the right precuneus, left superior frontal gyrus, and bilateral insula.

The 2D subsampling provides assessments of clusters' sensitivity to both item and feature sampling variability.

Our results demonstrate that the face-related N170 response is sensitive to visual face features and extend the characteristics of N170 with the sensitivity to repeated items to other familiar objects of expertise (i.e. words).

We predicted that participants in the Hands Near condition would exhibit enhanced visual processing that would produce increased accuracy and greater sensitivity to target items.

The ERFs showed a level of sensitivity to changes in item familiarity superior to that reported previously in very similar studies where ERPs were acquired.

It is a four-subscale (impulsivity, drive, reward responsivity, and sensitivity to punishment), 33-item measure in which the caregiver must respond from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) to a series of questions tapping their child's sensitivity to reward (e.g., "Your child generally prefers activities that involved immediate reward").

The current study suggests that sensitivity to interference from similar items in memory may provide a better explanation of comprehension failure.

Thus, the CSA demonstrates sensitivity to the number of items maintained in memory.

This postulate simplifies the simulation but it does not reflect the real sensitivity to NA of the items from the GHQ-12 or from the Siegrist questionnaire.