Exact(13)
Specific detection of a simulating biothreat agent (e.g. Bacillus atrophaeus) by immuno-magnetic or PCR assays did not display any significant loss of sensitivity, false negative or positive results in the presence of SRBM.
Standard errors of sensitivity, false discovery rate, and genomic distance estimates are estimated using 1,000 bootstrap samples.
Candidate biomarkers often lack diagnostic utility because of poor sensitivity (false negatives) and/or inadequate specificity (false positives) derived from confounding exposures, nonspecific biomarkers or individual variability.
In general, the performance of a statistical detection algorithm is characterized by a tradeoff among three factors: sensitivity, false positive rate, and timeliness.
Inherent with the high sensitivity, false positive results are a well-recognized problem associated with the PCR diagnosis of pertussis and other respiratory illnesses.
When the ideal loss function is applied, the risks were calculated by: Rd (θ j ) = -Σ P (x i | θ j ) u (θ j, d (x i )) These probabilities correspond to the specificity, sensitivity, false positive and false negative conditions.
Similar(47)
In our study, in case of 100% sensitivity, false-positive values (1-specificity) were 70.8% and 75.8% for hs-CRP/SDMA/O2∙− model and hs-CRP alone, respectively.
Sensitivity, specificity, false positives and false negatives of verbal autopsy differed between causes of death (Table 3).
Statistical procession included the investigation of sensitivity, specificity, false negative ratio, false positive ratio, positive predictive value and negative predictive value in the individual cases.
Sensitivity, specificity, false positives and false negatives values of Veo were calculated and presented with 95% CIs, in comparison with results from FBP acquisitions.
The validation statistics, viz., efficiency, misclassification rate, positive predictive power, negative predictive power, sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, and false negative rate, are defined using Eqs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com