Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
FL478 (IR66946-3B-178-1-1) was the tolerant check and the sensitive check was IR29.
a Border; b NKSWR149; c NKSWR112; d NKSWR104; e NKSWR092; f NKSWR119; g NKSWR085; h NKSWR115; i NKSWR132; j NKSWR097; k Oryza nivara330646 l NKSWR1433; m NKSWR101; n NKSWR079; o FL478; p VSR156; q Border (NKSWR143 is tolerant other accessions are sensitive, FL478- tolerant check, VSR156- sensitive check).
In a third experiment, IR64-Sub1 and Samba Mahsuri-Sub1 were compared with their recurrent parents and with a tolerant check (IR49830) and a sensitive check (IR42).
Progress of symptoms was monitored and final scoring was done (using the SES, Standard Evaluation System, with 1 denoting normal growth and 9 most plants dead or dying; [ 63]) once the sensitive check reached an average score of 6 – 7, which was typically 12 – 15 days after the initial salinisation and 9 – 11 days post-180-mM treatment.
Ten extra rows of IR42 (∼250 hills) were planted on one side of the deep pond to observe the extent of damage of this sensitive check and to use this as a guide to decide when to terminate the submergence treatment.
6: Remember, if your lips are sensitive, check the ingredients on the wrapper of the balm.
Similar(53)
In addition, 6 cultivated O. sativa (salt tolerant FL478, CSR27, CSR11 with different tolerance mechanisms, MI48 as a moderate check while VSR156 and Pusa 44 as sensitive checks) were used.
Both were used as sensitive checks.
Eighteen entries were screened per Styrofoam float, with FL478 and IR29 included in each tray as tolerant and sensitive checks, respectively.
In 2009, plant height, tiller and panicle number, flowering time and maturity, and grain yield were determined for 17 tolerant genotypes and 2 sensitive checks following IRRI standard procedures (Gomez 1972).
Under SF, the sensitive checks Swarna and IR42 produced six panicles each and showed the highest relative reductions in panicle number (54 and 63 %, respectively), compared with control conditions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com