Sentence examples for semantic restriction from inspiring English sources

In addition to the causal restriction imposed by the causal account (mutatis mutandis for the counterfactual and dispositional accounts), the semantic account imposes a semantic restriction.

The syntactic account may be seen as adding a restriction on acceptable mappings that replaces the semantic restriction proposed by the semantic account.

Instead of a semantic restriction, the syntactic account imposes a syntactic restriction: only physical states that qualify as syntactic may be mapped onto computational descriptions, thereby qualifying as computational states.

It shows significant improvements in the presentation of results which offer new information seeking capabilities, by the combination of different search techniques such as concordance, positional restriction, semantic restriction and keyword lookup.

It is argued that both structural and semantic restrictions are required to account for the empirical patterns.

The acceptability of (26) contrasts directly with the unacceptability of (16a) above, showing a difference in semantic restrictions of fixin' to and finna.

We report an experiment in which self-paced reading times were found to be longer for complements that required type-shifting than for complements that directly matched the semantic restrictions of the matrix verb.

When these verbs occur with a complement that does not directly denote either an activity or an event (e.g. '…began the book' or '…enjoyed the book'), the complement must be type-shifted from an object to an activity to conform to the verb's semantic restrictions.

It enables to express some semantic restrictions over the graph data with using graph patterns.

Notable extensions include QPTL, the propositionally quantified extension of LTL, which is decidable, though with non-elementary complexity, as well as CTL* under some special semantic restrictions, see French (2001).

Crucially, the syntactic violation relied on a structural syntactic dependency between two non-adjacent words in the sentence, whereas the semantic violation relied on purely lexical semantic restrictions of the preceding verb.