Sentence examples for semantic divergence from inspiring English sources

A natural response to this argument is that if the environments of the two agents are different, and this is responsible for their semantic divergence, then that environmental difference simply needs to be folded into the relevant laws, which are of course massively underdescribed anyway (clearly more than P1 by itself is needed to guarantee any effect, and thus M1).

Both cases would effectively prevent the maneuver of folding environmental differences into the relevant laws so as to block the counterexamples, because the global physical indiscernibility of the imagined worlds (essentially amounting to the two creatures inhabiting the same world) provides nothing on which to pin the semantic divergence.

The aim of this fMRI investigation was to identify those areas of the brain associated with approaching a story generation task creatively and to investigate the effects upon these correlates of incorporating a set of words that were unrelated to each other a strategy considered to encourage semantic divergence.

This is not just a matter of semantic divergences, but also of divergences related to cultural understanding of concepts, words (signs) and sentences.

This is not a semantic difference.

Given this divergence from standard semantic theories, one may wonder whether epistemic intensions deserve to be considered a kind of meaning.

The only orientation they can provide given the irreducible divergence is a semantic and hermeneutic structuring of a basically open future to allow a better informed and reflected debate for preparing decision-making.

Although scarcely investigated (cf. section 2), we argue here that the problems of indeterminacy faced by the analyst may be due to a divergence between the semantic and syntactic streams of information and, in this sense, due to an indeterminacy in the transitivity system (cf. Halliday's quote above).

Thirdly, using the evoked potential technique, we attempted to examine how early a divergence between different semantic categories could be observed.

Our procedure involves the construction of a context-vector representing the target's meaning and the use of the Kullback-Leibler divergence measure for quantifying its semantic change.

Significantly, these images often commit meanings that are unavailable in the verbiage, such as distinct narrative processes offering instant illustrations of the NGOs' work, plus beneficiaries' attributes (age, dress, etc)., thus sharing the semantic load with the verbiage through ideational divergence (Painter and Martin 2011).