Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(14)
The method shows good selectivity, precision, linearity and sensitivity.
The developed method was thoroughly validated for its linearity, selectivity, precision and accuracy.
Despite the logarithmic relationship between peak area responses versus concentrations, sufficient selectivity, precision and accuracy were achieved.
The repeatability, reproducibility, selectivity, precision and accuracy of all the methods in all media were investigated and calculated.
The validated method showed good results of linearity in the concentration range from 3 to 4.32 μg/mL (r2 = 0.9999), selectivity, precision, robustness and accuracy of 99.74%.
This method was fully validated showing selectivity, precision, accuracy and linearity over the range 1.0 50.0 μg mL−1 for chlorpropamide, 1.0 10.0 μg mL−1 for gliclazide and 0.1 1.0 μg mL−1 for glimepiride.
Similar(46)
Method parameters were varied to assess the impact on sensitivity (recall: fraction of global homologs selected) and precision (selectivity: fraction of selected sequences that were global homologs).
The selectivity and precision were acceptable.
The method was then investigated with respect to its selectivity, linearity, precision, detection limit (LOD) and quantitation limit (LO Q.
The developed method was validated for selectivity, linearity, precision, accuracy, recovery, limit of quantitation (LOQ), and limit of detection (LOD).
The derivatization reaction of artemisinin was used in an analytical method which was submitted to validation, after reaching the specification of the selectivity, linearity, precision, accuracy and robustness.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com