Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Selective outcome bias seems to be present [17]-[19] [17]-[19]
There was no selective outcome reporting bias in the three studies (Table 2).
Similarly, the risk of reporting bias (selective outcome reporting) was unclear for all of the retrospective studies.
Non-English language requires expensive translation to prevent selective outcome extraction and misinterpretation of results.
Non-English language articles require expensive translations to prevent selective outcome extraction and misinterpretation of results.
The likely bias from selective outcome reporting is to overestimate the effect of the experimental treatment.
For example, the agreement was fair (0.40) for selective outcome reporting and almost perfect (0.86) for sequence generation.
The information given in Table S1 can be invoked to determine the selective outcome of competing strains.
Clinical trial registration was thus established to improve the transparency of clinical trials, reducing selective outcome reporting.
First, relying on the published or final trial report may not result in accurate assessment of selective outcome reporting.
Protocols were identified for 5/42 studies (12%); in 3 cases the assessment of selective outcome reporting changed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com