Sentence examples for selection of practitioners from inspiring English sources

The procedure for selection of practitioners for each treatment group should be described, with an account of whether and how those included in the study differ from the average practitioner (e.g. training, experience).

Studies conducted in academic health centers also make no claims about the random selection of practitioners or patients in their studies, although characteristics of those practitioners and patients are always described.

The selection process of practitioners and adherence to the intervention were not clearly reported in all RCT studies.

An electronic survey was distributed to a random selection of family practitioners in England.

Data was however collected from 57 of 61 (93%) of providers in the nominated teams, avoiding self selection of interested practitioners.

A Norwegian study from 1993 showed that among a selection of general practitioners, 93% had experienced a conflict between responsibility towards the individual patient and the requirement to manage the health budget [ 15].

Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus were identified through a search, using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnosis codes for type 1 diabetes (E10 and all its subcategories), of the databases of hospitals, endocrinologists, and a selection of general practitioners in our region with a special interest in diabetes.

A structured questionnaire based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour was sent by mail to a random selection of 2100 general practitioners and 1800 primary care midwives.

Selection of towns, general practitioners (GPs) and participants was based on the methods used for the British Regional Heart Study of men (Shaper et al, 1981).

The selection of the private practitioners was based on foreknowledge by the first author that one (obstetrician/gynaecologist) provided abortions in his clinic and another (obstetrician/gynaecologists) was a member of an advocacy group for comprehensive abortion care.

Based on the discussions within our selection of Norwegian general practitioners, we extract some competing concerns that complicate rationing decisions in primary care and make it difficult to say no to patients who insist on receiving services even when their demands are in conflict with a commitment to legitimate and fair resource allocation.