Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
As NSCLC are tumors with a high degree of heterogeneity, genes characterizing histological features were identified using strictly selected tumor samples.
This may explain as to why only 61.2% (199 of 325) of our samples were evaluable by MS-PCR and why only in 75% of the cases replicate experiments on 20 randomly selected tumor samples yielded reproducible results.
For western blotting we selected tumor samples (six adenocarcinomas and one normal lung tissue) with available fresh frozen tissue.
We obtained the same results when we selected tumor samples based on a cell content filter (see Methods), which reduced the number of primary tumors to 120, and when we compared the 59 matched tumor and normal samples.
A total of 177 of the 179 selected tumor samples represent muscle invasive carcinoma stage pT2 or above.
PCR products (downstream fragment) amplified from sodium bisulfite-modified of selected tumor samples were purified and methylation percentages were determined by Epitect sequencing (Qiagen).
Similar(54)
Relative expression to a calibrator sample (fetal brain or selected tumor sample) was calculated using the Pfafl equation [ 54].
In this young patient with stage IV gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, we performed global gene analysis of DNA copy number changes in selected tumor cells sampled from a chemotherapy-resistant bone marrow metastasis.
Five μg tRNA of selected tumor and cell samples were amplified according to the Affymetrix manual using the GeneChip® One-Cycle Target Labeling and Control kit.
Involved pathologist carefully reviewed all CRC samples and selected tumor sections which were most representative of each tumor.
In this report we randomly selected 59 tumor samples to explore the potential inter-observer variability between pathologists assessment of PTEN loss of expression by IHC, and concordance of IHC PTEN loss and the Taqman® results (see Figure 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com