Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
The selected studies provide results from 78,399 cases from various patient cohort types, including blood donors (249), healthy individuals (adult: 2793; pediatric: 406), routine ANA screening populations (adult: 59,444; pediatric: 200), ANA positive healthy individuals (118), and routine ANA screening cohorts with ANA positive status (n = 15,189; Fig. 4).
Most of the selected studies provide information on equity in treatment and in treatment outcomes.
Similar(58)
Only one of the 4 selected studies provided data on the vaccination status of colonized individuals [29].
We then provide a brief review of the English-language literature and highlighting selected studies that provide information on the outcome and sequelae of pediatric hydrocephalus, and the impact of predictive variables on outcome.
In the conclusions and discussion, we will further discuss the empirical findings from the selected studies and provide suggestions for future research.
Therefore, we chose to perform a systematic review of the selected studies and provide a descriptive presentation of the observed findings instead of performing a meta-analysis that uses statistical models to adjust for this heterogeneity to some extent.
MN assisted in developing the study protocol and selected studies and provided critiques of successive drafts of the manuscript.
6 We selected studies that provided a quantitative estimate of the association between ever use of smokeless tobacco products and occurrence (incidence or mortality) of myocardial infarction or stroke among never smokers.
Nonetheless, the three selected case studies provided additional insight into the activities, efforts to promote, and actual utilization of research findings into policy and practice.
Ten selected studies [ 38– 48, 49] 49] provided a clear description of the study population included, and in three studies [ 37, 46, 47] no indications of referral to colonoscopy were provided.
The extracted variables were classified according to the information provided by the selected studies for each outcome (Table 3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com