Sentence examples for selected by chance from inspiring English sources

Given the non-optimal filter, sizes were used each 2 SDs closer together than the optimal filter sizes, the chance of such suboptimal filters being selected by chance is very small, particularly if multiple phantom acquisitions are performed for filter selection (for instance, three repeats are recommended in the NEMA Standard [6]).

Brown archaeoastronomers may justify this assumption through reading historical or ethnographic sources, while Green archaeoastronomers tend to prove that alignments are unlikely to be selected by chance, usually by demonstrating common patterns of alignment at multiple sites.

Only ∼30 genes were expected to be selected by chance using this statistical technique (see Materials and Methods for details).

The accuracy obtained with the worst-wKIERA-ranked variables is close to random classification as expected and shows that the best-ranked variables were not selected by chance.

Nine networks were found significantly enriched with scores ranging from 9 to 19 (data not shown), the probability for a network to be selected by chance (score<3) decreasing when its corresponding score value increases.

In the case that not a single gene was actually differentially expressed, ∼700 genes ( = 14,012×0.05) and ∼655 genes ( = 13,096×0.05) would be expected to be selected by chance alone in the 143BTK− and the A549 dataset, respectively.

In adult patients VRE account only for a certain percentage of all intestinal enterococci and non-selective screening would most likely be unable to select (by chance) for resistant variants [ 21].

In 2013 a portion of workers were re-selected by chance and survey respondents from this group were referred to as the 'cohort' (men = 161; women = 423).

The statistical significance reported above was calculated considering the probability of selecting by chance in the list of differentially expressed genes exactly 52 and 73 genes in common with the 153 previously identified (hypergeometric distribution).

At an FDR of 1%, there were 317 significant genes, which means that only three of these genes would be expected to be selected by random chance (false positive).

Besides invoking possible SNP call errors in any of the three samples, a reasonable explanation for the 75 SNPs of case (4) could reside in a "sampling effect", that is, only NIL-BH individuals homozygous at these SNPs were actually genotyped, having been selected by effect of chance among individuals in fact segregating in a 1 1 proportion.