Suggestions(1)
Exact(6)
After finishing exploring solutions close to the initially selected better similarity threshold, Algorithm 2 returns to users a cluster of similar images associated with the highest value of γ – in range (gamma _{text {better}}^) and (gamma _{text {better}}^).
Table 5 shows that MULTICOM consistently selected better top models more frequently than any other QA method.
Moreover, we counted the total number of times one QA method selected better models than all other QA methods.
More is the number of microarray experiments selected, better will be the reliability of the reference genes identified by the server.
The most frequent element chosen was "gluten-free choices in restaurants", which was selected by 68.8% of participants; "gluten-free choices in supermarkets" was chosen by 36.0% and "informative campaigns in all social contexts" (e.g. schools, restaurants) by 36.6%; 32.9% of patients selected "better labelling"; 22.8% chose "earlier diagnosis", and only 2.9% chose "better dietetic counseling".
Interestingly, SELECTpro only selected better model once (Table 5), yet it had the higher average GDT-TS scores for all the top one models than the other 13 individual QA methods (Table 4), suggesting that SELECTpro selected top models with relatively higher GDT-TS score for most targets, but not necessarily the best models compared with other individual QA methods.
Similar(54)
Instead, a multi-path selection routing protocol can select better paths by explicitly taking the quality of the wireless links into account.
People borrowed for breast implants and home renovations, and lenders pored over payment data in search of patterns that could help them select better borrowers in the future.
It helps us to select better solutions with higher chance.
This reasoning leads to the opposite prediction that people would select better photographs for themselves.
This evidence leads to the prediction that people would select better photographs for strangers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com