Suggestions(1)
Exact(5)
In all cases, we used purposive sampling to select interviewees, and used in-depth interviews to gather data.
This enabled us to select interviewees who could best provide detailed insight into specific working practices regarding the issues being examined.
A randomized selection and screening procedure based on age, sex, and educational level was used to select interviewees from within contacted households.
However, choosing to select interviewees who were all former classmates from one school provided some control on unobserved early influences in adolescent years among subgroups of respondents, which is central to our argument on socialization.
Another limitation is that not all participants from the intervention group could be interviewed, although the sampling procedure was designed to select interviewees who would best represent the main sampling criteria.
Similar(55)
Maximum variation was the aim when selecting interviewees, and the selection was made using an emergent purposive sampling approach, based on the stakeholder's background, opinion about patient involvement, gender, geographical spread and number of OMERACT conferences attended.
(Bearman's advice was that, in the absence of a system of randomly selecting interviewees, one should choose the person whom one feels least inclined to interview).
The interview content from the three interviewees who volunteered did not show any indication of deviant attitudes or expression, neither positive or negative, compared to the other randomly selected interviewees.
We purposively selected interviewees to help explore the key topics being studied [ 18].
However, there are only 17 purposively selected interviewees from Muscat governorate; these may not be representative of the entire country context.
In addition, maximal variation sampling was used by selecting interviewees with different responsibilities and levels of expertise in different levels of medical universities and the Ministry of Health and Medical Education.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com