Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "seems because of" is not grammatically correct and should not be used in written English.
It is often a mistake made by non-native English speakers who are trying to say "seems to be because of." Instead, you can use "appears to be due to" or "seems to be a result of." For example: - She seems to be due to her hard work and dedication. - His success appears to be a result of his resilience and determination.
Exact(22)
Not, it seems, because of the measures taken to deter them.
Those who are canceling are doing so, it seems, because of poverty, not improved technology.
The naming of Vitt, as odd as it seems because of his pending suspension, was not unexpected.
Trump is convinced that he will win Pennsylvania, it seems, because of the support he sees in the state.
Lionfish are here in the Atlantic, it seems, because of owners of living room aquariums who tired of the upkeep but didn't want to kill their fish.
The date, though, may have to be postponed, because of worries about the SARS virus and, it seems, because of renewed political tension between the two countries.
Similar(38)
I say "seemed," because of course it didn't.
The book emphasizes how deceptively effortless Mr. Jobs's ideas now seem because of their extreme intuitiveness and foresight.
A bid for controller fell short in 2006, largely it seemed because of his centrist voting record, motivating in part his drive to eliminate party-dominated primaries.
Nevertheless, following a similar conceit to its predecessors, the drama unfolds mostly through the actions of the three sacrificial interns, Ashley, Talita and Samantha, who were cast, it would seem, because of their sense of aggression, entitlement or insecurity, respectively.
So the idea of a truth-maker turns out to be far less intuitive and attractive than it initially seemed because of its commitment to an abstract and mysterious array of truth-bearers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com