Sentence examples for seem to omit from inspiring English sources
You seem to omit a caution for us not to give credence to any warnings from President Bush or anyone in his administration based on seven years' history of costly and deadly lies.
To the Sports Editor: The articles on the behavior by the former Rutgers men's basketball coach Mike Rice all seem to omit the words that come to my mind when hearing that he kicked players and threw basketballs at their heads: assault and battery.
However, their adopted timescales in table 1 seem to omit the dependence finally.
The authors mention three stability rules, however they test only one (the third) and seem to omit a fourth one (the sign matrix should be invertible – see e.g. the May 1973 ref).
What it seems to omit is any explanation of why the various organisms are similar to or different from each other.
So much of the coverage of the U.S. presence in Afghanistan seems to omit or ignore that arguably the biggest reason the U.S. is there (and will stick around past 2014, no doubt) is to keep eyes on Pakistan.
Reading this discussion reminded me of Stuart Brown's styles of "play personality," which, as several commenters pointed out, seemed to omit the computer-programmer's kind of play, though perhaps it is encompassed in Brown's #7.
A potential limitation to the M1 or M2 immune phenotyping scheme is that it seems to omit microglia undergoing cell division as a response to macrophage colony-stimulating factor CSF-1 or the recently identified IL-34.
However, these so-called defenders of truth and morality always seem to deliberately omit the fact that the CDC says that homophobia and its negative effects on the LGBT community, not the so-called gay lifestyle, are clearly to blame for these health risks.
The two translators seem to have omitted the short introduction and the explicit where the work is described as an uncommitted report of the falâsifa's teachings.
Its authors might want to bring that claim up with the Internal Revenue Service, which seems to have omitted such a requirement from the relevant statute.The third question is the most interesting: why is an organisation that rakes in over $9 billion a year tax-exempt?
