Ai Feedback
Exact(25)
Only 12.5% of seedlings survived to this size, but survival and time to reach commercial size depended strongly on early growth history (first 10 years of life).
In P. leptocoma microsites, P. reflexa seedlings showed a higher percentage survival, and P. leptocoma seedlings survived for a longer amount of time.
Planted sagebrush seedlings survived at high rates (∼ 70% planted sagebrush survival 3 yr postplanting), even without crested wheatgrass control.
Endophyte presence altered the plant survival response to microsite: in P. reflexa microsites, endophyte-free P. leptocoma seedlings survived 50%% longer than control E+ seeds (Fig. 5A, P = 0.058, with low power due to low germination rates in these microsites, n = 12).
Despite growth rate differences, more than 75% of exotic and native seedlings survived over the experiment.
No seedlings survived in the black grama grassland or the creosotebush shrubland 2 years after planting.
Similar(35)
Distance had a highly significant overall effect on seedling survival, with much fewer seedlings surviving close to maternal trees compared to seedlings further away.
After the 300 mM H2O2 stress treatments, only up to two true leaves per seedling survived, such survival was also higher for the 35S A9/A4a lines compared to the 35S A9 lines (t = -4.87, P < 0.0001).
The intermediate group of treatments (Group 2) showed a high variation in seedling survival 113 DAT with 65 and 14% of seedlings surviving the high rate of terbuthylazine and low rate of hexazinone, respectively.
Both rates of metsulfuron-methyl and the low rates of terbuthylazine and triclopyr were classed as Group 3 because seedling survival increased rapidly with 86 and 78% of seedlings surviving under the high rate of metsulfuron-methyl and low rate of terbuthylazine at 113 DAT, respectively.
This results in a very low overall survival probability, with only 1.4% of seedlings surviving the first growth period.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com