Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The goal of 10,000 steps (or an additional 5,000 steps above a sedentary value) roughly corresponds to an additional energy expenditure of 150 kcal or an additional 2 to 2 1/2 miles of walking [ 18].
Similar(59)
Specifically, values between 0 99 counts per minute were classified as sedentary, values between 100 2019 were classified as light intensity, values between 2020 5998 were classified as moderate intensity, and values ≥ 5999 were classified as vigorous intensity.
Data presented are the mean±SEM with respect to sedentary control values.
Data presented are the mean ± SEM with respect to sedentary control values.
VO2peak in ml kg−1 min−1 as percentage of sedentary normative values was related with severity of fatigue as assessed with the VAS at the α = 0.10 level (trend).
Additionally, some authors demonstrated that the resting cardiac output was decreased in trained SHR, and it returned to sedentary SHR values only after 5 weeks of detraining.
In these studies, protein levels were expressed as percentage of sedentary controls, pretraining values, or untrained muscles as opposed to absolute relative values [15] [17].
Results on cardiorespiratory fitness were compared to normative values for sedentary persons and to normative values for people who exercise no more than 1 2 h a week (recreational) (Vos et al. 2001).
Participants were sedentary, with fitness values below the 20th percentile for age.
Convergent validity was established using Spearman's rho, by comparing the SIT-Q estimates of sedentary behaviour with values derived from a 7-Day Activity Diary.
With respect to the VAS, VO2peak in ml kg−1 min−1 (absolute and expressed as percentage of recreational normative values), VO2peak in ml kgFFM−1 min−1 (absolute and expressed as percentage of both sedentary and recreational normative values) and 6MWD (absolute and expressed as percentage of normative values) were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) correlated with severity of fatigue.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com