Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
The rate of caesarean sections was higher in induced compared with spontaneous labours, 21%% vs. 12%% respectively (p 0.01).
Metastatic foci were considered macroscopic when their diameter exceeded 1 mm, meaning that the measured area in their tumour sections was higher than 785,000 μm.
The proportion of elective and emergency caesarean sections was higher in the GDM group (21.1% vs. 14.9%), whereas vaginal delivery was more frequent in women without a GDM diagnosis (78.9% vs. 85.1%, Table 4).
Similar(57)
The rate of cesarean sections was high and similar between Spanish and foreign-born women.
Additionally, the fraction of caesarean sections was high (>50%) in the case of twins or higher order pregnancies, anomalies of foetal presentation, disproportion or anomalies of maternal pelvis, failed induction, eclampsia, and previous caesarean section.
In the present study, the incidence of Caesarian sections was high (82.2%) and it is possible that the principal determinant of this rate was the severe morbidity in itself, since the rate of Caesarian sections was significantly higher in the population of women who developed severe morbidity during pregnancy compared to those who developed it during the puerperium.
In general, the ductility and energy dissipation ability of specimens with circular sections are higher than those of the specimens with square sections.
Generally, the post-local buckling strength gained by the sections is higher for axially loaded columns than that of bi-axially loaded ones, and it decreases with increasing eccentricity for the same web and flange width thickness ratios.
Rates of LGA and cesarean sections were higher in insulin-treated women.
One study showed that age-adjusted caesarean sections were higher in women from low-income neighborhoods [ 44].
The likelihood of a caesarean section was higher in older women, independent of other risks, and in Afro-Caribbean women.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com