Suggestions(1)
Exact(4)
The use of doubly polished thin sections in the study of microfossils in volcanic rock leads to several advantages compared to the use of ordinary thin sections.
Scale bars in A: 10 μm, in B: 5 μm and in C: 1 μm. Figure 4 illustrates an example of the advantages of using doubly polished thin sections in the study of internal morphology and microstructures of microfossils.
Open image in new window Fig. 5 A schematic position of the aquifer types and location of the sampling points in the study area Open image in new window Fig. 6 Schematic cross sections in the study area along the A A' and B' B lines (positions marked in Fig. 3).
Third, the histological sections in the study were ∼6 μm thick whereas the CBCT slice was 80 μm thick.
Similar(56)
Khalifa and Nanni (2002) increased the shear strength of beams using GFRP in the different angle in the test specimens with T cross-section in the study they performed.
A comparison between columns 3 and 4 of Table 1 shows a clear tendency of the minp calculated through the LOCAL test to be more sensitive than the test of the previous section, in the study of our microsatellites.
The hospital was the only institution offering comprehensive obstetric care (including caesarean section) in the study area.
This was validated using the forward and backward LR method to check for consistency and was used to determine the predictive factors of caesarean section in the study.
Since breech presentation at or near term was an absolute indication for caesarean section in the study hospital, all fetuses with breech presentation were excluded.
The incidence of the cesarean sections in this study is low in both study groups.
To illustrate this, in the Japanese series, the percentage of patients in whom micrometastases were detected did not linearly rise with increased sectioning (24%% in the study with five serial sections, vs. 27%% in the study with eight serial sections).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com