Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
sections discrepancy
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "sections discrepancy" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to a discrepancy found within different sections of a document or report, but it lacks clarity and proper context. Example: "The sections discrepancy in the report led to confusion among the team members regarding the data presented."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
When evaluating the sections, discrepancy in sample number was related to tissue loss during the transfer of the TMA sections onto the slides.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
As shown in the Example section, discrepancies between Km and Kf can occur as the result of differences between male and female patterns of mortality that generate a greater level of genetic variance in females than in males.
Science
The coding inconsistencies in these trusts appeared to be occurring systematically, accounting for 31% of all emergency/elective caesarean section discrepancies, 42% of all forceps/vacuum delivery discrepancies, 28% of all instrumental/non-instrumental delivery discrepancies, and 99% of all breech/vacuum delivery discrepancies.
Science
All of these processes are tightly regulated by a plethora of genes (discussed in the successive sections), and discrepancies in any of these pathways can lead to infertility.
Two observers (SA and TS), who had no previous knowledge of the clinical parameters and outcomes for each patient, independently reviewed the immunohistochemically stained sections; all discrepancies were resolved by joint review of the slides in question.
Science
However, for the bluff section, noticeable discrepancies exist between different methods.
Even though the actual field performance of the CRCP test sections shows appreciable discrepancy with its prediction, it still remains within the allowable limit for structural integrity.
As shown in Section 5, the discrepancy between and does affect the estimation accuracy and the optimum value of may be determined via simulation.
These are: whether virus effects could be due to avidity, clarifying the meaning of tau in Table 2, expanding on the rationale for subsampling in the Punctuated evolution section, the apparent discrepancy between Figure 4 and its legend, eliminating the orphan paragraph described in point #3 below, and a paragraph in the Discussion summarizing the main biological results.
Science
In man, this is a common feature of SE, but not in SS [ 1]. c-KIT positive tumour cells were revealed in 32/44 (73%) examined sections, which is in discrepancy with the role of this protein as a marker for human SE.
There are differences between LV-FAST and manual segmentation, as described in Section 3. The discrepancies at the apex minimally affected calculated chamber volumes, whereas basal discrepancies yielded larger volumetric differences.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Prefer "discrepancy between sections" or "inconsistencies across sections" for better clarity and grammatical correctness.
Common error
Avoid stringing nouns together without prepositions. Instead of "sections discrepancy", use a prepositional phrase such as "discrepancy between sections" to clarify the relationship between the nouns.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "sections discrepancy" functions as a noun phrase intended to denote an inconsistency or difference found between distinct sections of a document or analysis. However, according to Ludwig AI, the phrase is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "sections discrepancy" is an attempt to describe an inconsistency between different parts of a text or data set. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. A more appropriate and clear way to express this idea would be to use "discrepancy between sections" or "inconsistencies across sections". While the phrase does appear in some scientific contexts, its infrequent and grammatically questionable nature suggests avoiding it in favor of clearer alternatives. Therefore, while the intent is understandable, the execution falls short of standard English usage.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
discrepancy between sections
Reverses the order of the nouns to follow a more standard grammatical structure.
inconsistencies across sections
Replaces "discrepancy" with "inconsistencies" to highlight a lack of uniformity.
variations among sections
Uses "variations" to emphasize differences in content or data.
differences within sections
Replaces "discrepancy" with "differences" for broader applicability.
contradictions between sections
Emphasizes direct oppositions in information.
mismatches across sections
Highlights instances where elements do not align or correspond correctly.
disagreements between sections
Indicates conflicts or diverging opinions presented in different parts.
discordance among sections
Signifies a lack of harmony or agreement in the narrative or data.
divergences in sections
Focuses on points where sections move away from a common theme or finding.
conflict among sections
Highlights direct contradictions or opposing viewpoints in different parts of a document.
FAQs
What is the correct way to refer to a difference between sections?
The more grammatically sound and widely accepted way to refer to a difference between sections is to use the phrase "discrepancy between sections" or "inconsistencies across sections".
Is "sections discrepancy" grammatically correct?
No, "sections discrepancy" is not grammatically correct. It is better to say "discrepancy between sections" to clearly show the relationship between the two nouns.
How can I rephrase "sections discrepancy" to sound more professional?
To sound more professional, use phrases like "discrepancy between sections", "inconsistencies across sections", or "variations among sections".
What does "sections discrepancy" mean?
"Sections discrepancy" is intended to convey that there is a difference or inconsistency between various sections, although it's not grammatically optimal. It's better to use "discrepancy between sections" to avoid ambiguity.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested