Sentence examples for sections are assumed from inspiring English sources

To model the rotor, cross sections are assumed to be radially rigid.

Pre-determined sections are assumed for beams and columns, and the corresponding interaction curves are utilized to check whether the selected section for each member is acceptable.

The trailing vortices shed from the leading edge sections are assumed to join together to form a strong tip and root vortex.

For the cases investigated, the hot and cold sections were assumed to comprise approximately 30% of the vertical walls.

The optimum number of sections was assumed to be where the graph of CV plotted against the number of sections leveled out, that is, the point beyond which increasing the number of sections did not reduce the variability further.

A cantilever bending force was applied perpendicularly to the femur neck at a speed of 5 mm/minute until fracture occurred; the femur neck cross sections were assumed to be elliptically shaped, the section modulus is Wz = πab/32: Where a is the width of the cross section in the superior-inferior direction, and b is the width in the anterior-posterior direction.

Briefly, a compression force was applied to the cylinder samples of the L2 body specimen at a rate of 2.5 mm/minute (Instron 3367); the L2 body cross sections were assumed to be elliptically shaped, two diameters, anterior-posterior (a) and left-right (b), of this cylinder were measured using vernier caliper and used to calculate the cross-sectional area (S) (S = πab/4).

A bending force was applied to the middle femur shaft at a speed of 5 mm/minute until fracture occurred; the femur cross sections were assumed to be elliptically shaped, the moment of inertia is I = π[ab-\ a-\2t)(b-\2t)]/64: Where a is the width of the cross section in the medial-lateral direction, b is the width in the anterior-posterior direction, and t is the average cortical thickness.

Hollow circular cross-sections are assumed for all elements, although the shape of the cross-section has minimal effect on most optimal topologies under the linear elasticity assumption made throughout this work.

The values given in the literature for these coefficients are usually determined by using elementary rod and beam theory, in which the cross-sections are assumed to remain planar.

The principal axes of the cross-section are assumed to coincide with the principal normal and binormal vectors of the centerline of the beam.