Suggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Each section was evaluated using the Mankin Histological and Histochemical Grading System (HHGS) [ 10].
Scoring for each section was evaluated using a 0 to 4 scale with increments of 0.5.
A lung injury score for each lung section was evaluated using a VILI histopathology scoring system as previously described [ 34].
Similar(57)
In this section, the proposed coding tools of the previous section are evaluated using the DVC codec described in Section 3. Before presenting the experimental results obtained, the test conditions are first defined.
The three most densely infiltrated areas in each H&E section were evaluated using an ocular grid with 100 small squares, each single square area 0.01 mm.
In addition, the reliability of the direct strength method for the I-shaped open sections was evaluated using reliability analysis.
To evaluate the coatings in cross-section, the MWCNT and MWCNT-COOH collagen mixture were coated on glass coverslips and the cross-section was evaluated using SEM.
The intratumor distribution of fluorescence-labeled anti-TF-NC-6300 anti-TF-NC-6300 anti-TF-NC-6300 anti-TF-NC-6300 using a fluorescence microscope.
Sections were evaluated using a fluorescence microscope and pictures were taken along the IBZ.
Sections were evaluated using light microscopy on a LEITZ DMR microscope (Leica Microsystems, Rueil-Malmaison, France).
The sections were evaluated using a Leica TCS SP2 confocal laser scanning microscope system, equipped with an inverted Leica DM IRBE microscope, an argon laser, and two HeNe lasers (Leica Microsystems, Germany).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com