Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The two-photon absorption (2PA) cross section values were determined by two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) measurements in DMF.
Averages of all section values were taken as the average value for each mouse brain.
Similar(58)
The orders of magnitude that are covered by the different cross section values are very similar in all cases, and the order of the states with respect to their MPA behavior is similar within the even- and odd-photon absorption groups.
The integrated and mean cross-section values were deduced from the experiment.
(2) The 2PA cross-section values were obtained both by Z-Scan and two-photon excited fluorescence (2PEF) measurements.
A total of 594 nitrogen collision cross-section values were measured empirically in this study, representing three biomolecular classes (lipids, carbohydrates, and peptides) and TAA salts.
Two photon absorption cross section value was measured as 220 GM at 800 nm wavelength for the 3TFABDP compound.
They observed that if the instrument was calibrated with the drift-time collision cross-section values of peptides for phospholipid measurement, then the average difference between the drift-time and the T-wave collision cross-section values was 7%, whereas with phospholipid drift-time data this value can be decreased below 0.5%.
In cases where different degrees of staining were observed within the same section, average values were taken e.g. 2+/1+ = 1.5.
We did include an expanded version for our ChIP-qPCR data analysis in the methods section: CT values were obtained for sonicated chromatin taken before (input) and after immunoprecipitation (ChIP).
Model input (mean and uncertainty range); for scenarios, see " Analysis" section aMean values were obtained from the trial [ 11] and the low and high value was obtained by assuming a standard error of 10% The probability to contract an IFI during the 112-day period following initiation of prophylaxis with either posaconazole (5.3%) or fluconazole (9.0%) was obtained from Ullmann et al. [ 11].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com