"section of questions" is a perfectly valid phrase that can be used in written English.
You could use it when referring to a group of questions related to a certain topic, for example: "The second section of questions in the survey focused on attitudes towards public transport."
The exam consists of 40 questions on general biology and a second section of questions on ecology or molecular biology, depending on the student's choice.
The first section of questions related to the on-farm conditions.
ClinicalCases.org [ 20] includes a section of questions prepared by medical experts, e.g., to request the right diagnosis.
The section of questions concerning "nurse-patients respectful interaction" obtained the lowest frequency of no answers, perhaps due to the universality of this topic, easily understood by everyone.
We created a separate section of questions for bereaved parents to explore their views and recommendations on whether and how parents should be approached about a clinical trial after a child's death.
Some survey items asked questions with response options constructed as a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 10, with anchors defined as appropriate for each section of questions (eg, 'not important', 0 and 'extremely important', 10).
Then the participant worked on the two sections of questions as described above (approximately 20 minutes per section).
Each subject used the Authorship Portal to answer two sections of questions and then provide ratings on a number of statements and their demographic data in a third section.
Upon finishing the two sections of questions, the subject filled out a short questionnaire asking them to rate (on a five-point Likert Scale) their perception on the u6sability of the portal's visualization functionality and to provide demographic data.
A small number of participants skipped particular sections of questions: 15/523 did not respond to questions concerning information about the course(s) they teach (15 participants), and 16/523 did not respond to questions concerning personal views on teaching and evolution (16 participants).
Order response bias from subjective assessment was controlled by random allocation of: the direction of all ordinal scales like the ones just mentioned; and the two sections of questions addressing attitudes and behaviors on the one hand, and risk perceptions on the other hand.
